← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tre Peck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-04-29 Country: USA
Army
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Totino-Grace USHS-MN 20 3 5 8 0.400 0.0506 0.0506 0.0972 0.0972
2022-23 Totino-Grace USHS-MN 25 8 8 16 0.640 0.0810 0.0810 0.1555 0.1555
2023-24 Totino-Grace USHS-MN 26 26 19 45 1.731 0.2191 0.2191 0.7277 0.8195
2024-25 Powell River Kings BCHL 18 3 2 5 0.278 0.1070 0.1151 0.4043 0.4350
2025-26 Spruce Grove Saints BCHL 52 17 30 47 0.904 0.3482 0.3618 1.3153 1.3667
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28410
Forward overall
#966
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ UMass (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Arizona State (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Army Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NCDC 2017-18
0.11
actual FR PPG at Army
NAHL 2014-15
0.15
actual FR PPG at Army
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.25
actual FR PPG at Army
NAHL 2020-21
0.89
actual FR PPG at Army

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2020-21
0.552 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2010-11
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2000-01
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.