← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tre Peck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-04-29 Country: USA
Army
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Totino-Grace USHS-MN 20 3 5 8 0.400 0.0506 0.0506 0.0971 0.0971
2022-23 Totino-Grace USHS-MN 25 8 8 16 0.640 0.0810 0.0810 0.1554 0.1554
2023-24 Totino-Grace USHS-MN 26 26 19 45 1.731 0.2191 0.2191 0.7272 0.8189
2024-25 Powell River Kings BCHL 18 3 2 5 0.278 0.1070 0.1151 0.4040 0.4347
2025-26 Spruce Grove Saints BCHL 52 17 30 47 0.904 0.3482 0.3618 1.3145 1.3658
2026-27 Prince George Cougars WHL 5 2 0 2 0.400 0.1946 0.1946 0.9771 0.9771
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28837
Forward overall
#1014
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

Army Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.17
actual FR PPG at Army
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.32
actual FR PPG at Army
USHS-MN 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Army
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.63
actual FR PPG at Army

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2004-05
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2023-24
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.