← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jimmy Dodig Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-06-07 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Merrimack
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 31 4 12 16 0.516 0.0653 0.0653 0.1253 0.1253
2023-24 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 30 6 18 24 0.800 0.1013 0.1013 0.1942 0.1942
2024-25 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 28 4 21 25 0.893 0.1130 0.1130 — —
2025-26 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 56 10 13 23 0.411 0.1509 0.1508 0.4341 0.4338
2026-27 Omaha Lancers USHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.1180 0.1180 0.6001 0.6001
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
32%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6971
Defenseman overall
#1469
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Merrimack Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.29
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
NAHL 2016-17
0.14
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
NAHL 2014-15
0.35
actual FR PPG at Merrimack

D2/3 Comparables

Lake Forest · 2008-09
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2011-12
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2004-05
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.