← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jimmy Dodig Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-06-07 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Merrimack
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 31 4 12 16 0.516 0.0653 0.0653 0.1254 0.1254
2023-24 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 30 6 18 24 0.800 0.1013 0.1013 0.1943 0.1943
2024-25 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 28 4 21 25 0.893 0.1130 0.1130
2025-26 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 56 10 13 23 0.411 0.1509 0.1508 0.4335 0.4332
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6837
Defenseman overall
#1436
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Merrimack Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.29
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
USHL 2013-14
0.35
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
NCDC 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
USHL 2016-17
0.40
actual FR PPG at Merrimack

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2012-13
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2003-04
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.