IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan George Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-01-27 Country: USA
Army
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Chippewa Steel NAHL 14 0 1 1 0.071 0.0262 0.0283 0.0754 0.0815
2025-26 Minnesota Mallards NAHL 23 1 14 15 0.652 0.2396 0.2471 0.6884 0.7099
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8209
Defenseman overall
#1152
Defenseman born in 2007
#2957
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Nolan Gluchowski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dakota Mermis
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Denver (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vince Pedrie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Woods
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Wingels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

Army Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Thomas Farrell
NAHL 2017-18
0.31
actual FR PPG at Army
Jude Brower
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.07
actual FR PPG at Army
Brody Medeiros
AJHL 2017-18
0.00
actual FR PPG at Army
Owen Nolan
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.12
actual FR PPG at Army

D2/3 Comparables

Jared Coccimiglio
Neumann · 2022-23
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Jobb
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2007-08
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony McIntyre
Manhattanville · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.