IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Malawski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-12-20 Country: Canada
Middlebury
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Hotchkiss School NE-Prep 25 5 4 9 0.360 0.0713 0.0713 0.1640 0.1640
2024-25 Hotchkiss School NE-Prep 25 1 12 13 0.520 0.1030 0.1030 — —
2025-26 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 51 1 8 9 0.176 0.0648 0.0633 0.1863 0.1819
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16587
Defenseman overall
#3071
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Middlebury Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Kamil Tkaczuk
0.24
actual FR PPG at Middlebury
Mitchell Allen
0.42
actual FR PPG at Middlebury
Landon Brownlee
0.42
actual FR PPG at Middlebury
Dimitri Tzaferis
0.21
actual FR PPG at Middlebury

D2/3 Comparables

Greg Malafronte
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2016-17
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Gates
SUNY Brockport · 2022-23
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Caden Connors
Assumption · 2023-24
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.