← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Felker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-03-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 57 18 11 29 0.509 0.1869 0.1934 0.5370 0.5557
2019-20 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 50 6 4 10 0.200 0.1180 0.1180 0.6007 0.6007
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Army D1 AHA SR 14 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Army D1 AHA JR 37 3 2 5 0.135
2021-22 Army D1 AHA SO 35 2 7 9 0.257
2020-21 Army D1 AHA FR 22 3 3 6 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2020-21 · Army
+64.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35614
Forward overall
#1868
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2016-17
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tufts · 2022-23
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.