IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Massimiliano Monson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-19 Country: USA
Endicott
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 22 6 3 9 0.409 0.1576 0.1529 0.5954 0.5777
2025-26 — NAHL 49 13 16 29 0.592 0.2174 0.2040 0.6246 0.5861
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27966
Forward overall
#1625
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Endicott Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jack Kilty
0.53
actual FR PPG at Endicott
Parker Wood
0.88
actual FR PPG at Endicott
Thomas Pisciotta
0.70
actual FR PPG at Endicott
Primo Self
0.68
actual FR PPG at Endicott

D2/3 Comparables

Vladislav Sorokin
Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryden McGhee
Williams · 2009-10
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Bohn
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2005-06
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.