← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joseph Samango Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-30 Country: USA
SUNY Oswego
Verbal SUNYAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 51 1 18 19 0.372 0.1519 0.1581 0.2981 0.3102
2024-25 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 53 20 40 60 1.132 0.4616 0.4598 0.9059 0.9024
2025-26 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 53 5 21 26 0.491 0.1802 0.1701 0.5185 0.4895
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11780
Forward overall
#545
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

SUNY Oswego Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.00
actual FR PPG at SUNY Oswego
0.50
actual FR PPG at SUNY Oswego
0.50
actual FR PPG at SUNY Oswego
0.67
actual FR PPG at SUNY Oswego

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2015-16
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.