IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Giles Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-18 Country: USA
Trinity
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Brunswick NE-Prep 28 13 14 27 0.964 0.1939 0.1939 0.4410 0.4410
2022-23 Brunswick NE-Prep 29 2 8 10 0.345 0.0693 0.0693 0.1577 0.1577
2023-24 Powell River Kings BCHL 17 0 2 2 0.118 0.0453 0.0461 0.1710 0.1738
2024-25 Powell River Kings BCHL 54 15 21 36 0.667 0.2569 0.2482 0.9696 0.9369
2025-26 — BCHL 31 9 13 22 0.710 0.2734 0.2541 1.0322 0.9595
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16094
Forward overall
#827
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

Trinity Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Lucas Michaud
0.89
actual FR PPG at Trinity
Timothy Weinstein
3.00
actual FR PPG at Trinity
Ty Broad
0.87
actual FR PPG at Trinity
Jax Murray
0.88
actual FR PPG at Trinity

D2/3 Comparables

Jeremy Olinyk
St. Norbert · 2012-13
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aidan Verbeke
SUNY Brockport · 2013-14
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Frankie DeAugustine
UMass Boston · 2011-12
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.