← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nico Pasquale Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-05-01 Country: USA
Babson
LittleEast D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Berkshire School NE-Prep 25 2 2 4 0.160 0.0317 0.0317 0.0729 0.0729
2022-23 Berkshire School NE-Prep 28 2 15 17 0.607 0.1203 0.1203 0.2766 0.2766
2023-24 Berkshire School NE-Prep 32 3 12 15 0.469 0.0929 0.0929 0.2136 0.2136
2024-25 NCDC 48 1 8 9 0.188 0.0764 0.0761 0.1507 0.1501
2025-26 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 31 2 5 7 0.226 0.0830 0.0784 0.2383 0.2250
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9785
Defenseman overall
#2138
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Babson Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.42
actual FR PPG at Babson
0.30
actual FR PPG at Babson
0.56
actual FR PPG at Babson
0.00
actual FR PPG at Babson

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2014-15
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2015-16
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Middlebury · 2023-24
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.