← New Search ↗ Social Card

Corwith Simmers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-04-13 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Hamilton
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Kimball Union NE-Prep 33 16 6 22 0.667 0.1321 0.1321 0.3037 0.3037
2023-24 Kimball Union NE-Prep 37 25 30 55 1.486 0.2945 0.2945 0.6772 0.6772
2024-25 Kimball Union NE-Prep 21 13 13 26 1.238 0.2453 0.2453 0.5641 0.5641
2025-26 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 10 4 1 5 0.500 0.1837 0.1822 0.5278 0.5234
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14272
Forward overall
#557
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

Hamilton Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.89
actual FR PPG at Hamilton
0.96
actual FR PPG at Hamilton
0.41
actual FR PPG at Hamilton
0.40
actual FR PPG at Hamilton

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2015-16
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.