IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Russell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-10-03 Country: USA
St. Lawrence
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 Vernon Vipers BCHL 24 2 3 5 0.208 0.0803 0.0892 0.3031 0.3366
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#57691
Forward overall
#1341
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Blake Christensen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ American International (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jack Billings
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Niagara
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG
Connor Hurley
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Biagio Lerario
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Sheehy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Elite
NCAAe PPG

St. Lawrence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Reilly Connors
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.26
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Cayden Casey
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.31
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Callum Cusinato
OJHL 2015-16
0.24
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Cade Gleekel
USHS-MN 2014-15
0.14
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence

D2/3 Comparables

Jude Kurtas
UMass Boston · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Love
Neumann · 2005-06
0.650 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nathan McDevitt
Post · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.