← New Search ↗ Social Card

Timothy Donohue Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-10-06 Country: USA
Sacred Heart
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Westminster NE-Prep 23 3 3 6 0.261 0.0517 0.0517 0.1189 0.1189
2024-25 Westminster NE-Prep 27 6 10 16 0.593 0.1174 0.1174 0.2700 0.2700
2025-26 Westminster NE-Prep 19 8 14 22 1.158 0.2294 0.2294 1.0555 1.1778
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25153
Forward overall
#371
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

Sacred Heart Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.69
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.17
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.27
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart
OJHL 2016-17
0.22
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2021-22
1.560 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.