← New Search ↗ Social Card

Timothy Donohue Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-10-06 Country: USA
Sacred Heart
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Westminster NE-Prep 23 3 3 6 0.261 0.0525 0.0525 0.1193 0.1193
2024-25 Westminster NE-Prep 27 6 10 16 0.593 0.1192 0.1192 0.2710 0.2710
2025-26 Westminster NE-Prep 19 8 14 22 1.158 0.2329 0.2329 1.0569 1.1794
2026-27 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 7 2 4 6 0.857 0.3149 0.3411 0.9059 0.9813
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25557
Forward overall
#443
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG

Sacred Heart Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

OJHL 2016-17
0.22
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart
NCDC 2022-23
0.17
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.69
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart

D2/3 Comparables

Colby · 2002-03
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2014-15
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.