IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Pedalino Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-04-29 Country: USA
UMass Lowell
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Rochester Jr. Americans NAHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2026-27 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 5 1 2 3 0.600 0.2204 0.2339 0.6341 0.6730
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Jeff Taylor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Union (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Benning
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jaccob Slavin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Renouf
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Maine (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ian Brady
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

UMass Lowell Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Chase Blackmun
USHL 2017-18
0.44
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
Ben Meehan
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.47
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
T.J. Schweighardt
NCDC 2019-20
0.11
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell
Larry Keenan
BCHL 2023-24
0.28
actual FR PPG at UMass Lowell

D2/3 Comparables

Scott Hudson
Manhattanville · 2006-07
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Hodd-Chlebeck
Saint John's · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Maxwell Cole
Salem State · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.