← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tristan Lemyre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 44 30 32 62 1.409 0.4292 0.4292 1.0443 1.0443
2020-21 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 50 13 24 37 0.740 0.4549 0.4549 2.1802 2.1802
2021-22 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 57 29 21 50 0.877 0.5392 0.4786 2.5844 2.2938
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota D1 BigTen 40 16 19 35 0.875
2025-26 Minnesota State D1 CCHA SR 40 16 19 35 0.875
2024-25 Western Michigan D1 NCHC 42 6 8 14 0.333
2023-24 Denver D1 NCHC 24 2 4 6 0.250
2022-23 Denver D1 NCHC 17 4 3 7 0.412
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.41
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2022-23 · Denver
0.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5768
Forward overall
#220
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2024-25
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.