← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dryden Kuramoto Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-03-12 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Lindenwood
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0771 0.0898 0.2911 0.3390
2022-23 BCHL 42 3 8 11 0.262 0.1009 0.1125 0.3811 0.4251
2023-24 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 51 8 24 32 0.627 0.2418 0.2586 0.9132 0.9768
2024-25 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 30 5 14 19 0.633 0.2440 0.2487 0.9216 0.9394
2025-26 Surrey Eagles BCHL 39 8 17 25 0.641 0.2470 0.2427 0.9328 0.9165
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23144
Forward overall
#1074
Forward born in 2006
#1191
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

Lindenwood Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2021-22
0.21
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.89
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
CCHL 2019-20
1.00
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.20
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood

D2/3 Comparables

Wilkes · 2016-17
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2022-23
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2022-23
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.