← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dryden Kuramoto Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-03-12 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Lindenwood
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0771 0.0898 0.2909 0.3387
2022-23 — BCHL 42 3 8 11 0.262 0.1009 0.1125 0.3809 0.4249
2023-24 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 51 8 24 32 0.627 0.2418 0.2586 0.9126 0.9761
2024-25 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 30 5 14 19 0.633 0.2440 0.2487 0.9211 0.9389
2025-26 Surrey Eagles BCHL 39 8 17 25 0.641 0.2470 0.2427 0.9323 0.9160
2026-27 Surrey Eagles BCHL 3 1 3 4 1.333 0.5137 0.5137 1.9392 1.9392
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23476
Forward overall
#1099
Forward born in 2006
#1233
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Lindenwood Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2025-26
0.00
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
NAHL 2025-26
0.00
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
QMJHL 2024-25
0.93
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
NAHL 2021-22
0.58
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
1.267 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2021-22
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.