← New Search ↗ Social Card

Roarke Gilmour Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-07-12 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Maine
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 — CCHL 46 9 22 31 0.674 0.1462 0.1515 0.5162 0.5348
2025-26 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 51 13 26 39 0.765 0.1472 0.1449 0.4832 0.4758
2026-27 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 6 1 4 5 0.833 0.1604 0.1604 0.5266 0.5266
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6365
Defenseman overall
#1352
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

Maine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2018-19
0.17
actual FR PPG at Maine
MJHL 2016-17
0.59
actual FR PPG at Maine
NAHL 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Maine
BCHL 2021-22
0.32
actual FR PPG at Maine

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2011-12
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2004-05
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.