← New Search ↗ Social Card

Roarke Gilmour Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-07-12 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Maine
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 CCHL 46 9 22 31 0.674 0.1462 0.1515 0.5214 0.5402
2025-26 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 51 13 26 39 0.765 0.1472 0.1449 0.4822 0.4748
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6258
Defenseman overall
#1327
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Maine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Maine
AJHL 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Maine
USHL 2021-22
0.18
actual FR PPG at Maine
USHL 2017-18
0.06
actual FR PPG at Maine

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2017-18
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2014-15
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2021-22
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.