← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Warnick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-10-02 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Northern Michigan
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 MJHL 40 6 3 9 0.225 0.0433 0.0476 0.1419 0.1559
2024-25 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 57 22 40 62 1.088 0.2094 0.2185 0.6859 0.7158
2025-26 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 53 16 29 45 0.849 0.3272 0.3306 1.2357 1.2486
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21212
Forward overall
#948
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Northern Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2014-15
0.33
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
USHL-Style-Czech 2020-21
0.18
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.26
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
SJHL 2022-23
0.33
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Augsburg · 2014-15
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2022-23
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.