← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nathan Tobey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-01-02 Country: USA
Quinnipiac
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 50 0 3 3 0.060 0.0446 0.0451 0.2239 0.2265
2022-23 NTDP-U18 56 0 6 6 0.107 0.0796 0.0763 0.3996 0.3832
2023-24 Madison Capitols USHL 59 0 9 9 0.152 0.0900 0.0886 0.4580 0.4507
2024-25 Omaha Lancers USHL 14 0 2 2 0.143 0.0843 0.0787 0.4292 0.4005
2025-26 Janesville Jets NAHL 52 6 24 30 0.577 0.2120 0.1967 0.6089 0.5650
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10963
Defenseman overall
#2297
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Quinnipiac Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

WHL 2024-25
0.25
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
QMJHL 2025-26
0.17
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
USports-M 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac

D2/3 Comparables

Suffolk · 2024-25
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2005-06
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2012-13
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.