IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ian Crowley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-02-06 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Tufts
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Governors Academy NE-Prep 27 3 6 9 0.333 0.0660 0.0660 0.1519 0.1519
2023-24 Governors Academy NE-Prep 26 2 11 13 0.500 0.0990 0.0990 0.2278 0.2278
2024-25 Governors Academy NE-Prep 30 10 17 27 0.900 0.1783 0.1783 0.4100 0.4100
2025-26 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 53 3 9 12 0.226 0.0872 0.0853 0.3295 0.3222
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10502
Defenseman overall
#2073
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG

Tufts Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Cal LeClair
0.28
actual FR PPG at Tufts
Trevor John
0.80
actual FR PPG at Tufts
Machlan Sawden
0.29
actual FR PPG at Tufts
J.J. Ganss
0.00
actual FR PPG at Tufts

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Ella
Nichols · 2006-07
0.828 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
William Yates
St. Norbert · 2015-16
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan MacIntyre
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2005-06
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.