← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rohan Guevarra Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-03-19 Country: Canada
Alaska Anchorage
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 4 2 0 2 0.500 0.0963 0.1080 0.3160 0.3544
2024-25 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 56 26 29 55 0.982 0.1891 0.2017 0.6206 0.6619
2025-26 Blackfalds Bulldogs BCHL 16 1 4 5 0.312 0.1204 0.1244 0.4545 0.4697
2026-27 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 4 2 1 3 0.750 0.1444 0.1444 0.4739 0.4739
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17005
Forward overall
#511
Forward born in 2007
#111
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Anchorage Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2013-14
0.11
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
BCHL 2014-15
0.00
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
NAHL 2012-13
0.00
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
NA3HL 2021-22
0.09
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage

D2/3 Comparables

Hamline · 2010-11
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2018-19
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2009-10
0.793 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.