← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rohan Guevarra Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-03-19 Country: Canada
Alaska Anchorage
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 4 2 0 2 0.500 0.0963 0.1080 0.3153 0.3536
2024-25 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 56 26 29 55 0.982 0.1891 0.2017 0.6193 0.6605
2025-26 Blackfalds Bulldogs BCHL 16 1 4 5 0.312 0.1204 0.1244 0.4548 0.4700
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16720
Forward overall
#478
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Anchorage Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
0.28
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
NAHL 2017-18
0.00
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
CCHL 2017-18
0.00
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
SJHL 2014-15
0.00
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage

D2/3 Comparables

Babson · 2019-20
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Colby · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2000-01
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.