← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brody Green Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-11-14 Country: Canada
Northern Michigan
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 54 13 22 35 0.648 0.1248 0.1441 0.4087 0.4718
2024-25 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 57 19 17 36 0.632 0.1216 0.1337 0.3983 0.4379
2025-26 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 30 11 19 30 1.000 0.1925 0.2024 0.6306 0.6632
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38219
Forward overall
#1544
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Northern Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2016-17
0.51
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
USHL 2019-20
0.18
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
AJHL 2015-16
0.38
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
NAHL 2012-13
0.26
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Salve Regina · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2010-11
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2016-17
1.276 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.