IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Pineau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-01-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 26 1 11 12 0.462 0.1828 0.1881 0.4845 0.4986
2022-23 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 56 1 7 8 0.143 0.0878 0.0822 0.4210 0.3942
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Brown D1 ECAC JR 31 1 8 9 0.290
2024-25 Brown D1 ECAC JR 32 7 9 16 0.500
2023-24 Brown D1 ECAC SO 30 7 8 15 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2023-24 · Brown
+325.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12389
Defenseman overall
#2475
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Allen
St. Norbert · 2005-06
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Schindel
Manhattanville · 2006-07
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Webb
Utica · 2001-02
1.577 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.