IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Frédéric Deschênes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-10-23 Country: Canada
Michigan State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 41 0 6 6 0.146 0.0863 0.0927 0.4394 0.4719
2023-24 — BCHL 53 4 23 27 0.509 0.1963 0.2062 0.7413 0.7787
2024-25 — BCHL 43 5 20 25 0.581 0.2240 0.2240 0.8461 0.8462
2025-26 — BCHL 51 6 24 30 0.588 0.2266 0.2183 0.8560 0.8246
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6213
Defenseman overall
#1526
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

Michigan State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Josh Jacobs
OHL 2015-16
0.26
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Mitch Eliot
OHL 2017-18
0.09
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Damian Chrcek
BCHL 2015-16
0.19
actual FR PPG at Michigan State
Anthony Scarsella
NAHL 2015-16
0.00
actual FR PPG at Michigan State

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Barrow
Wilkes · 2017-18
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Anderson
Hamilton · 2009-10
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Della Paolera
Anna Maria · 2021-22
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.