← New Search ↗ Social Card

Garin Ludwig Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-02-17 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Air Force
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 42 0 2 2 0.048 0.0281 0.0292 0.1430 0.1488
2024-25 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 51 3 28 31 0.608 0.2342 0.2380 0.8845 0.8988
2025-26 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 12 0 1 1 0.083 0.0491 0.0462 0.2502 0.2355
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14874
Defenseman overall
#2664
Defenseman born in 2006
#3686
in USHL

D1 Comparables

OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Air Force Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.12
actual FR PPG at Air Force
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.18
actual FR PPG at Air Force
USHL 2019-20
0.21
actual FR PPG at Air Force
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Air Force

D2/3 Comparables

Hamilton · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2023-24
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.