IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dreyton Aleman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-01-31 Country: Canada
Lindenwood
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Calgary Canucks AJHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0671 0.0744 0.1850 0.2051
2025-26 — AJHL 21 0 2 2 0.095 0.0319 0.0336 0.0881 0.0928
2026-27 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 4 0 2 2 0.500 0.1677 0.1677 0.4626 0.4626
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29788
Defenseman overall
#1642
Defenseman born in 2008
#2942
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Johnny Wingels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eric Sweetman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Woods
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vince Pedrie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Garret Cockerill
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Lindenwood Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jack Anderson
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.33
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Connor Gengle
AJHL 2023-24
0.17
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Kim Elfving
SuperElit 2025-26
0.00
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Caleb Price
NAHL 2018-19
0.33
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Volonnino
Plymouth State · 2012-13
1.056 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrue Trelstad
Wisconsin-Stout · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Corey Kennedy
Neumann · 2013-14
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.