IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dreyton Aleman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-01-31 Country: Canada
Lindenwood
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Calgary Canucks AJHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0671 0.0744 0.1851 0.2053
2025-26 — AJHL 21 0 2 2 0.095 0.0319 0.0336 0.0881 0.0928
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
65%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29506
Defenseman overall
#1500
Defenseman born in 2008
#2930
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

David Drake
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Alex Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Alec McCrea
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Clint Lewis
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Wolanin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Lindenwood Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jack Anderson
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.33
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Jonathan Wong
BCHL 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Joe Prouty
NAHL 2019-20
0.37
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Noah Houle
USPHL-Premier 2021-22
0.50
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood

D2/3 Comparables

Nolan Cavanagh
Lebanon Valley · 2017-18
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Phil Kiss
Curry · 2010-11
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Coffey
Hobart · 2015-16
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.