← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hayden Reid Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-06-21 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Clarkson
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 60 6 10 16 0.267 0.1573 0.1663 0.8003 0.8462
2024-25 Flint Firebirds OHL 51 9 7 16 0.314 0.1815 0.1825 0.8214 0.8258
2025-26 Niagara IceDogs OHL 68 18 24 42 0.618 0.3573 0.3413 1.6171 1.5445
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20821
Forward overall
#932
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG

Clarkson Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2021-22
0.21
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
BCHL 2014-15
0.55
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
BCHL 2016-17
0.27
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
BCHL 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Clarkson

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2018-19
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2018-19
1.409 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.