← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Posthumus Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-21 Country: Canada
St. Lawrence
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Nepean Raiders CCHL 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.0362 0.0403 0.1290 0.1437
2022-23 Nepean Raiders CCHL 54 19 29 48 0.889 0.1928 0.2061 0.6877 0.7352
2023-24 Tri-City Storm USHL 38 3 10 13 0.342 0.2018 0.2008 1.0275 1.0222
2024-25 Penticton Vees BCHL 52 25 21 46 0.885 0.3408 0.3308 1.2874 1.2495
2025-26 Oshawa Generals OHL 67 23 34 57 0.851 0.4921 0.4392 2.1859 1.9510
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10467
Forward overall
#464
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG

St. Lawrence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2023-24
0.56
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.31
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
USHL 2013-14
0.22
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
USHL 2018-19
0.36
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
1.267 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2000-01
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.