← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-04-19 Country: USA
Denver
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Topeka Scarecrows USHL 59 17 15 32 0.542 0.3200 0.3242 1.6290 1.6503
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 Bemidji State D1 CCHA SR 29 5 10 15 0.517
2005-06 Bemidji State D1 CCHA JR 33 17 12 29 0.879
2004-05 Bemidji State D1 CCHA SO 26 5 5 10 0.385
2003-04 Bemidji State D1 CCHA FR 30 3 10 13 0.433
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2003-04 · Bemidji State
+56.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13334
Forward overall
#412
Forward born in 1984
#1258
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Arizona State (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Maine (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Bentley (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Denver Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2023-24
0.23
actual FR PPG at Denver
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.36
actual FR PPG at Denver
USHL 2017-18
0.63
actual FR PPG at Denver
BCHL 2018-19
0.05
actual FR PPG at Denver

D2/3 Comparables

Chatham · 2019-20
1.292 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2016-17
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.