← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caden Lee Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-09-30 Country: USA
Minnesota State
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Chanhassen USHS-MN 18 7 3 10 0.556 0.0703 0.0703 0.1349 0.1349
2021-22 Chanhassen USHS-MN 26 13 13 26 1.000 0.1266 0.1266 0.2428 0.2428
2022-23 Chanhassen USHS-MN 28 25 18 43 1.536 0.1944 0.1944 0.3729 0.3729
2023-24 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 13 2 4 6 0.462 0.2722 0.2780 1.3848 1.4142
2024-25 Omaha Lancers USHL 59 12 7 19 0.322 0.1899 0.1842 0.9662 0.9374
2025-26 Omaha Lancers USHL 8 0 3 3 0.375 0.2212 0.2039 1.1253 1.0374
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21898
Forward overall
#1187
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Minnesota State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.25
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State
USHS-MN 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State
USHL 2015-16
0.18
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2009-10
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2017-18
1.034 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2022-23
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.