← New Search ↗ Social Card

Price Grimes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-01-28 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
New Hampshire
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Chicago Steel USHL 41 1 5 6 0.146 0.0863 0.0895 0.4394 0.4559
2024-25 BCHL 50 3 7 10 0.200 0.0771 0.0781 0.2911 0.2950
2025-26 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 58 2 18 20 0.345 0.1267 0.1244 0.3639 0.3572
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15984
Defenseman overall
#2811
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

New Hampshire Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2021-22
0.23
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
AJHL 2012-13
0.00
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
USHL 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
NE-Prep 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2013-14
1.069 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tufts · 2015-16
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Assumption · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.