← New Search ↗ Social Card

Price Grimes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-01-28 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
New Hampshire
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Chicago Steel USHL 41 1 5 6 0.146 0.0863 0.0895 0.4390 0.4555
2024-25 — BCHL 50 3 7 10 0.200 0.0771 0.0781 0.2909 0.2948
2025-26 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 58 2 18 20 0.345 0.1267 0.1244 0.3644 0.3577
2026-27 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 7 1 4 5 0.714 0.2624 0.2490 0.7549 0.7162
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16224
Defenseman overall
#2842
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

New Hampshire Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
NE-Prep 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.23
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
USHL 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2012-13
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2018-19
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.