← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason Peapenburg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-06-09 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Wisconsin
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Chippewa Steel NAHL 31 0 9 9 0.290 0.1067 0.1175 1.5017 1.5854
2024-25 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 57 2 8 10 0.175 0.1035 0.1040 0.5268 0.5293
2025-26 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 17 0 1 1 0.059 0.0347 0.0332 0.1766 0.1689
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20935
Defenseman overall
#3404
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Wisconsin Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.27
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin
NAHL 2017-18
0.00
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin
USHL 2017-18
0.00
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.38
actual FR PPG at Wisconsin

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2023-24
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Roger Williams · 2023-24
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2005-06
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.