IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Holden Carter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-01-17 Country: USA
Army
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Omaha Lancers USHL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Omaha Lancers USHL 22 0 1 1 0.045 0.0268 0.0277 0.1367 0.1415
2025-26 Peterborough Petes OHL 14 0 3 3 0.214 0.1240 0.1220 0.5506 0.5417
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18207
Defenseman overall
#2285
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Niklas Folin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Sam Piazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Sweetman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Wingels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

Army Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Brad Zona
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Army
Owen Nolan
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.12
actual FR PPG at Army
Brody Medeiros
AJHL 2017-18
0.00
actual FR PPG at Army
Noah Wilson
NAHL 2017-18
0.04
actual FR PPG at Army

D2/3 Comparables

Liam Board
Neumann · 2011-12
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nolan Zotter
Canton · 2021-22
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnny Meo
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2007-08
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.