IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tucker Lyndaker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-05-29 Country: USA
Vermont
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Fargo Force USHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.1966 0.2169 1.0010 1.1044
2025-26 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 49 28 18 46 0.939 0.2301 0.2445 0.6464 0.6868
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
65%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17876
Forward overall
#246
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Dylan McLaughlin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Canisius (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dawson Cook
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mike Marnell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Frederik Tiffels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Avery Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG

Vermont Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Max Strand
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.67
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Blake Steenerson
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.41
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Tyler Dysart
NCDC 2021-22
0.09
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Daniel Sambuco
NCDC 2020-21
0.08
actual FR PPG at Vermont

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Galati
SUNY Oswego · 2009-10
1.241 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bailey
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Marinac
SUNY Brockport · 2009-10
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.