IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Graham Jones Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-08-16 Country: Canada
Boston College
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Fargo Force USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 Fargo Force USHL 61 26 26 52 0.853 0.5029 0.5108 2.5581 2.5982
2026-27 Penticton Vees WHL 5 5 3 8 1.600 0.7784 0.7784 3.9083 3.9083
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
85%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5366
Forward overall
#80
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Justin Kloos
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.93 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Zach Stepan
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.39 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.81 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Peter Quenneville
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.80 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Toninato
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Average
NCAAe PPG
Vinnie Hinostroza
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.94 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Elite
NCAAe PPG

Boston College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jeremy Bracco
OHL 2016-17
0.60
actual FR PPG at Boston College
Oskar Jellvik
SHL-J20 2021-22
0.50
actual FR PPG at Boston College
Jake Sondreal
USHL 2023-24
0.17
actual FR PPG at Boston College
Trevor Kuntar
USHL 2019-20
0.43
actual FR PPG at Boston College

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.