IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Monks Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-05-19 Country: USA
Merrimack
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Fargo Force USHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 Niagara IceDogs OHL 58 2 1 3 0.052 0.0299 0.0314 0.1354 0.1423
2026-27 Fargo Force USHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.1475 0.1475 0.7502 0.7502
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#62384
Forward overall
#1653
Forward born in 2008
#4470
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Pham
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Army (0.91 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG

Merrimack Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

David Sacco
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.11
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
Conor Lovett
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.33
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
Mac Welsher
USHL 2017-18
0.39
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
Jordan Hughesman
MJHL 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Merrimack

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Anderson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2012-13
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bailey Conger
UMass Boston · 2015-16
2.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
John Christen
St. Norbert · 2019-20
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.