IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Dabrowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-02-18 Country: USA
Merrimack
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 6 0 2 2 0.333 0.1225 0.1327 — —
2025-26 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 39 8 18 26 0.667 0.2449 0.2533 0.7037 0.7279
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19336
Forward overall
#571
Forward born in 2007
#1222
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Mackenzie MacEachern
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Blake Winiecki
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Merrimack Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Matt Copponi
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.36
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
Nick Pierre
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.47
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
Christian Simeone
USPHL-Premier-Classic 2015-16
0.13
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
Joe Cassetti
USHL 2017-18
0.14
actual FR PPG at Merrimack

D2/3 Comparables

Gabe Randel
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2022-23
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dakota Ulmer
Bryn Athyn · 2014-15
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jax Murray
Trinity · 2017-18
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.