IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kade Meyer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-11-05 Country: USA
St. Thomas
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.1062 0.1118 0.5332 0.5613
2025-26 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 22 1 4 5 0.227 0.1341 0.1444 0.6827 0.7352
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13738
Defenseman overall
#764
Defenseman born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Tyler Morrison
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Northland
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
R.J. Gicewicz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Kale Bennett
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Western Michigan
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Keaton Thompson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Phil Beaulieu
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

St. Thomas Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Chase Cheslock
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.37
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
Carson Peters
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.14
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
Colton Jamieson
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.11
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas
Bauer Berry
USHL 2022-23
0.38
actual FR PPG at St. Thomas

D2/3 Comparables

Cameron Wright
Stonehill · 2015-16
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Schroeder
Norwich · 2005-06
0.737 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Steve Schroeder
Norwich · 2005-06
0.742 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.