← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eric Frossard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-01-12 Country: Canada
2026 · Round 5, Pick #146  ·  Anaheim Ducks Anaheim Ducks
Notre Dame
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Guelph Storm OHL 30 0 2 2 0.067 0.0386 0.0418 0.1714 0.1857
2025-26 Guelph Storm OHL 51 5 9 14 0.275 0.1588 0.1641 0.7053 0.7287
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20224
Defenseman overall
#1072
Defenseman born in 2008
#1575
in OHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Cornell (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Canisius (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Notre Dame Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.03
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
USHL 2022-23
0.47
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
USHL 2014-15
0.31
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
OHL 2021-22
0.19
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2009-10
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2001-02
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2006-07
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.