IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eric Frossard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-01-12 Country: Canada
2026 · Round 5, Pick #146  ·  Anaheim Ducks Anaheim Ducks
Notre Dame
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Guelph Storm OHL 30 0 2 2 0.067 0.0386 0.0418 0.1746 0.1892
2025-26 Guelph Storm OHL 51 5 9 14 0.275 0.1588 0.1641 0.7188 0.7426
2026-27 Guelph Storm OHL 6 1 1 2 0.333 0.1928 0.1928 0.8727 0.8727
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20466
Defenseman overall
#1188
Defenseman born in 2008
#1597
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Vince Pedrie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Sweetman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dakota Mermis
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Denver (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Gluchowski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Wingels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

Notre Dame Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Henry Nelson
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.03
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
Caeden Carlisle
OHL 2022-23
0.19
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
Tory Dello
USHL 2015-16
0.31
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame
Tony Bretzman
BCHL 2013-14
0.12
actual FR PPG at Notre Dame

D2/3 Comparables

Richard Manley
SUNY Geneseo · 2008-09
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Bottrell
Adrian · 2015-16
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan DiScanio
University of New England · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.