← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke McNamara Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-02 Country: Canada
Western Michigan
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Saginaw Spirit OHL 63 7 15 22 0.349 0.2020 0.2188 0.8973 0.9718
2022-23 Saginaw Spirit OHL 67 8 19 27 0.403 0.2331 0.2424 1.0355 1.0767
2023-24 Saginaw Spirit OHL 60 10 24 34 0.567 0.3278 0.3251 1.4561 1.4442
2024-25 Windsor Spitfires OHL 63 12 16 28 0.444 0.2571 0.2417 1.1419 1.0737
2025-26 Fargo Force USHL 62 20 30 50 0.806 0.4758 0.4248 2.4222 2.1628
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10182
Forward overall
#440
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Western Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2021-22
0.95
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
NAHL 2019-20
0.11
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
USHL 2019-20
0.17
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
AJHL 2016-17
0.22
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2011-12
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2015-16
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.