IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Tang Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-04-15 Country: USA
Harvard
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Madison Capitols USHL 57 9 18 27 0.474 0.2794 0.3070 1.4227 1.5634
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

80%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16909
Forward overall
#51
Forward born in 2009
#1647
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.32 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Hitchcock
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Yale (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
Seamus Malone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.54 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.74 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dakota Joshua
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Alex Tuch
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Boston College (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Harvard Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Michael Callow
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.47
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Casey Severo
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.30
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Ty Pelton-Byce
USHL 2013-14
0.24
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Richard Gallant
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.53
actual FR PPG at Harvard

D2/3 Comparables

James Tatro
Salem State · 2021-22
1.269 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Maxwell Donohoe
Neumann · 2021-22
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Atkinson
Curry · 2005-06
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.