IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Tang Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-04-15 Country: USA
Top 72 — 2027 NHL Draft Prospect
Harvard
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Madison Capitols USHL 57 9 18 27 0.474 0.2794 0.3070 1.4214 1.5620
2026-27 Barrie Colts OHL 7 2 2 4 0.571 0.3306 0.3306 1.4962 1.4962
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17206
Forward overall
#72
Forward born in 2009

D1 Comparables

Luke Stork
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Scott Conway
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Penn State (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mike Marnell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Frederik Tiffels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Polino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ RPI (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Harvard Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Salvatore Guzzo
USHL 2022-23
0.14
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Richard Gallant
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.53
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Michael Callow
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.47
actual FR PPG at Harvard
Casey Severo
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.30
actual FR PPG at Harvard

D2/3 Comparables

Nolan Redler
UMass Boston · 2014-15
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Stillar
SUNY Morrisville · 2009-10
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Bickley
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.