← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rio Treharne Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-02-05 Country: USA
Northern Michigan
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Eden Prairie USHS-MN 24 2 2 4 0.167 0.0211 0.0211 0.0405 0.0405
2023-24 Eden Prairie USHS-MN 27 11 25 36 1.333 0.1688 0.1688 0.3239 0.3239
2024-25 Wisconsin Windigo NAHL 13 1 5 6 0.462 0.1696 0.1835 0.4871 0.5269
2025-26 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 49 6 20 26 0.531 0.3130 0.3097 1.5936 1.5767
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

78%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13766
Forward overall
#366
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Northern Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2015-16
0.22
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
SuperElit 2019-20
0.33
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
AJHL 2012-13
0.14
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
BCHL 2013-14
0.26
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2021-22
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2021-22
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.