← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Mannausau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-05-15 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Augustana
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Bemidji USHS-MN 26 1 8 9 0.346 0.0438 0.0438 0.0841 0.0841
2022-23 Bemidji USHS-MN 25 6 11 17 0.680 0.0861 0.0861 0.1652 0.1652
2023-24 Bemidji USHS-MN 22 5 10 15 0.682 0.0863 0.0863 0.1656 0.1656
2024-25 Bemidji USHS-MN 28 7 32 39 1.393 0.1763 0.1763 0.3383 0.3383
2025-26 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 59 4 16 20 0.339 0.2000 0.1906 1.0182 0.9703
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4380
Defenseman overall
#924
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Augustana Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2021-22
0.39
actual FR PPG at Augustana
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.10
actual FR PPG at Augustana
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Augustana
SJHL 2024-25
0.16
actual FR PPG at Augustana

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2011-12
1.241 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2023-24
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.