IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Oliver McKinney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-02-05 Country: USA
Michigan
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 37 8 6 14 0.378 0.2232 0.2432 1.1365 1.2381
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

72%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23668
Forward overall
#94
Forward born in 2009
#2309
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Jared Fiegl
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Cornell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Pavelek
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan State
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joe Snively
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Yale (0.88 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Liam Pecararo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Maine (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG
Michael Booth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Boston College (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Gavin Best
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Kaden Nelson
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Alex Bump
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.95
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Nick Pastujov
USHL 2014-15
0.11
actual FR PPG at Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Scott Hudson
Manhattanville · 2004-05
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bailey Conger
UMass Boston · 2014-15
2.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
John Barrett
Wilkes · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.