IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Oliver McKinney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-02-05 Country: USA
Michigan
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 37 8 6 14 0.378 0.2232 0.2432 1.1355 1.2371
2026-27 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.1475 0.1475 0.7502 0.7502
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24028
Forward overall
#122
Forward born in 2009
#2519
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Joe Widmar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ UMass (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siroky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Evans
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Eastman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Félix Caron
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ RPI (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Alex Bump
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.95
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Kaden Nelson
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Dexter Dancs
BCHL 2012-13
0.28
actual FR PPG at Michigan
Kason Muscutt
NAHL 2022-23
0.18
actual FR PPG at Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Stillar
SUNY Morrisville · 2008-09
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Kielich
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Fox
Salem State · 2004-05
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.