← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Norcross Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-07-10 Country: USA
Western Michigan
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 BCHL 39 7 12 19 0.487 0.1877 0.2038 0.7090 0.7698
2025-26 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 43 3 7 10 0.233 0.1372 0.1387 0.6986 0.7060
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35275
Forward overall
#1369
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Western Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.95
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
USHS-MN 2022-23
0.62
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2013-14
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2015-16
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2022-23
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.