IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen DeGraff Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-01-13 Country: USA
Penn State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 51 7 2 9 0.176 0.1041 0.1079 0.5296 0.5488
2026-27 Brantford Bulldogs OHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.1157 0.1157 0.5237 0.5237
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#45551
Forward overall
#972
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Penn State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Dylan Lugris
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.29
actual FR PPG at Penn State
Braedon Ford
USHL 2022-23
0.07
actual FR PPG at Penn State
Shea Van Olm
WHL 2022-23
0.36
actual FR PPG at Penn State
Blake Gober
BCHL 2013-14
0.38
actual FR PPG at Penn State

D2/3 Comparables

Franco Loparco
Concordia · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cullen Bradshaw
St. Norbert · 2008-09
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick DeBlois
New England College · 2014-15
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.