IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Boguniecki Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2009-04-22 Country: USA
Boston College
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 46 3 4 7 0.152 0.1131 0.1155 0.5679 0.5798
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

68%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21483
Defenseman overall
#286
Defenseman born in 2009

D1 Comparables

Ryan Collins
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jack Glover
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nathan Billitier
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Louie Belpedio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Miami (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
John MacLeod
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Boston University (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Boston College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Will Skahan
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.23
actual FR PPG at Boston College
Seamus Powell
NTDP-U18 2020-21
0.05
actual FR PPG at Boston College
Drew Fortescue
USHL 2021-22
0.20
actual FR PPG at Boston College
Lukas Gustafsson
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.54
actual FR PPG at Boston College

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Hawkrigg
Trinity · 2008-09
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Armour
Adrian · 2010-11
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Atkinson
Curry · 2004-05
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.