IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Sturgis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-02-03 Country: USA
Dartmouth
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Minnetonka USHS-MN 27 10 10 20 0.741 0.0938 0.0938 0.1799 0.1799
2025-26 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 6 0 2 2 0.333 0.1966 0.2043 1.0010 1.0401
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28500
Forward overall
#442
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Andrew Oglevie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siroky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Evans
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Garrett Gamez
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Providence (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joe Widmar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ UMass (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Dartmouth Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Cooper Flinton
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.56
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
Hank Cleaves
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.66
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
Nate Morgan
AJHL 2019-20
0.03
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
Brock Cummings
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.29
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth

D2/3 Comparables

Pat Egan
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2012-13
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Simon Boyko
Aurora · 2016-17
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Richard Manley
SUNY Geneseo · 2007-08
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.