← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kirby Perler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-03-29 Country: USA
Yale
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 58 1 10 11 0.190 0.0697 0.0759 0.2005 0.2183
2025-26 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 42 5 11 16 0.381 0.1400 0.1455 — —
2026-27 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 8 1 0 1 0.125 0.0459 0.0462 0.1321 0.1330
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14249
Defenseman overall
#1886
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Yale Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.29
actual FR PPG at Yale
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.26
actual FR PPG at Yale
USHS-MN 2024-25
0.13
actual FR PPG at Yale
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.26
actual FR PPG at Yale

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Maria · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.