IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Erik Larsen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-11-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Northern Lakes USHS-MN 27 5 13 18 0.667 0.0821 0.0821 0.1619 0.1619
2020-21 Northern Lakes USHS-MN 22 3 19 22 1.000 0.1232 0.1232 0.2429 0.2429
2021-22 North Iowa Bulls NA3HL 42 1 11 12 0.286 0.0316 0.0317 0.6302 0.6318
2022-23 New Mexico Ice Wolves NA3HL 46 2 9 11 0.239 0.0264 0.0253 0.0757 0.0724
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hamline D3 MIAC GR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Hamline D3 MIAC SR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15896
Defenseman overall
#2864
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chad Varney
Hamilton · 2017-18
0.100 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Spencer
Wisconsin-Superior · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Kovalchik
Castleton · 2012-13
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.