← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Pellegrini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-08-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 40 0 2 2 0.050 0.0123 0.0125 0.0342 0.0348
2016-17 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 52 2 9 11 0.211 0.0518 0.0504 0.1448 0.1409
2017-18 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 54 5 15 20 0.370 0.0908 0.0840 0.2535 0.2345
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Curry D3 CNE SR 24 3 7 10 0.417
2020-21 Curry D1 JR 5 0 2 2 0.400
2020-21 Curry D3 CNE JR 5 0 2 2 0.400
2019-20 Curry D1 SO 11 0 1 1 0.091
2019-20 Curry D3 CNE SO 11 0 1 1 0.091
2018-19 Curry D1 FR 22 2 3 5 0.227
2018-19 Curry D3 CNE FR 22 2 3 5 0.227
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2018-19 · Curry
+241.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21400
Defenseman overall
#2706
Defenseman born in 1997
#4081
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2005-06
0.346 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2009-10
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2021-22
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.